Bipolar 2 From Inside and Out

Posts tagged ‘mental health’

Men and Mental Health: Two Stories

There are so many Awareness Months these days that it’s hard to keep track of them all. June alone has Pride Month, Caribbean American Heritage Month, National Immigrant Heritage Month, Men’s Mental Health Month (which is also recognized in November), and National PTSD Awareness Month, as well as celebratory or awareness weeks and days.

The Verbate site, which keeps track of these awareness days and months, has this to say about Men’s Mental Health Month: “Men’s Mental Health Month raises awareness of the unique mental health challenges men face and the social stigma that often prevents them from seeking support. Research shows men are less likely to seek mental health care, despite experiencing higher rates of suicide and untreated mental health conditions. Cultural expectations around masculinity and self-reliance can deepen isolation. This observance encourages open conversation, early intervention, and inclusive definitions of well-being.”

They also offer suggestions on ways to celebrate the awareness month inclusively:

• Share mental health resources and benefits.

• Normalize help-seeking behaviors through leadership modeling.

• Highlight intersectional perspectives on masculinity.

• Encourage open, stigma-free conversations.

The statistics regarding men’s mental health are fairly well-known and easy enough to find, though they differ from source to source. Men’s rates of suicide, especially compared to women’s, are often mentioned. So too is the lower number of men seeking help for their mental health compared to women.

But statistics provide an arm’s-length look at the problems. While that’s valuable, so are men’s stories regarding the need for better care with mental health problems.

Owen’s Story

Owen worked for years in a highly responsible, high-stress job at a facility that required him to supervise a large number of men. The long hours contributed to his increasing inability to cope. His home life deteriorated, and he stopped pursuing his former interests and activities. His friendships fell by the wayside until he had only one close male friend.

Then Owen was fired from his job. He drove home, then sat in his car, unable to move. Before long, an ambulance pulled up. Owen’s coworkers had seen how distraught he was and called for a wellness check. The EMT squad took him to the emergency room for screening. Owen found it fairly easy to respond to the questions in ways that would not raise alarm bells and was sent home.

Over the following months, Owen realized that he needed emotional and mental help, rather than just a new job. He went to a therapist, who prescribed SSRIs and a course of talk therapy. Eventually, Owen was able to voice his feelings and move on to a lower-stress job that didn’t require him to supervise anyone. His mental health improved.

Franklin’s Story

Franklin was married with three young boys, and he had a temper. His wife, Leslie, had a progressively debilitating and ultimately fatal disorder, which meant that Franklin was increasingly responsible for the children. He shared his interest in trains with them and got them a pet tarantula. But the kids knew that when Daddy got mad, he blew up. Leslie joked with them that Franklin was like the Incredible Hulk; when he was angry, he turned into another person.

After Leslie died, there was no buffer between Franklin and his boys. As the kids grew up, they became more and more estranged from their father. Franklin had trouble keeping a job and, for a time, had to sleep in his car. Eventually, Franklin moved in with his aging mother and tried to care for her. But he reverted to his old habit of yelling at her when he was irritable or became angry. His physical health declined as he aged, too, and he never sought treatment for either his various ailments or his anger issues.

Seeking Help—Or Not

Owen’s and Franklin’s mental health suffered at various times over the years. Owen had less extreme bouts of depression besides the one when he lost his job. He lived off his retirement savings for a year. That relief from the pressures of the job, and the medication and therapy he received, turned his life around. He still experienced reactive depressive episodes, but not out of line with the extent of the everyday problems he encountered.

Franklin became an increasingly angry man. Family members wondered if he was treating his mother abusively, but never broached the subject with her because she had made it known that she was unwilling to accept any other living arrangement, such as assisted living.

Both Owen and Franklin would have benefited from a social structure that was more supportive of men receiving help with their mental health. Owen might have sought help before the long build-up to the end of his job and learned healthy ways to cope with the pressure. Franklin could have dealt with the death of his wife and caring for his aging mother while taming his temper and explosive interactions. Both would have been better off.

In this Men’s Mental Health Month, let’s try to reach out to friends, family members, and coworkers like Owen and Franklin before their situations become desperate. Help them get the help they need. They aren’t immune to psychological difficulties just because they’re men.

“Deprescribing” Psych Meds

I saw my psychiatrist this week for a med check and asked him about RFK, Jr.’s crusade against antidepressants. He said a good number of his clients had asked him about it. He reassured them that he was not going to cut them off.

Then Dr. G. said, “They’ll pull up to your house in a black Suburban, with face masks on, and ring your doorbell.” (He was joking.) I replied, “I have a gun.” (I wasn’t.)

Still, the fear is real. I’m not sure if Kennedy has an actual plan to curb what he considers an overprescribing of antidepressants. But those of us who need them are genuinely afraid that he will find some way to take them away from us. Maybe he’ll try to cut down the supply coming from the drug companies. Maybe he’ll invent some system by which doctors will be penalized for writing “too many” prescriptions. Or maybe he’ll put in place his threatened “wellness farms,” where people with mental illness will supposedly be cured by fresh air, organic food, no medication, and hard outdoor labor, much as he has recommended for “reparenting” children on ADHD meds.

The psychiatric community is as alarmed as their clients. At this year’s meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, doctors expressed fears that if Kennedy’s recommendations are put in force—and maybe even if they’re not—people who currently take antidepressants or other meds may decide to quit cold turkey or taper off without their physician’s advice and supervision, both of which are dangerous. Physicians also fear that patients will refuse necessary medications and relapse without them.

Kennedy has particularly targeted SSRIs (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors) such as Zoloft (sertraline), Prozac (fluoxetine), Lexapro (escitalopram), and Paxil (paroxetine). Other targeted medications include antipsychotic medications, mood stabilizers, stimulants, weight-loss drugs, ADHD medications like Adderall, and combinations of these drugs. All these, Kennedy says, add up to a “dependency crisis driven by overmedicalization.” He has described the people who take these medications as “addicts.”

Kennedy compared coming off SSRIs to his experiences with trying to curb his heroin addiction: “You just have to steel yourself for 72 bad hours.” (He said that he had tried to quit and gone through withdrawal “a hundred times.”) He has also said, without evidence, that SSRIs are partly responsible for the rise in school shootings and other mass shootings.

The New York Times reported that at the Mental Health and Overmedicalization Summit organized by the MAHA (Make America Healthy Again) Institute, speakers were discussing “a variety of steps to address the overprescription of psychiatric medications, such as phasing out school-based mental health screenings, requiring written informed consent before starting medications, and featuring prominent, cigarette-style warnings on packaging.” It’s also been proposed that clinicians be paid through government programs to “deprescribe” patients. Too, there were discussions about changes in insurance billing and an “expert panel” with the mission to “develop clinical guidelines for deprescribing.” “This summer,” the Department of Health and Human Services says, “The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, or SAMHSA, will release training modules focusing on the risks of psychiatric medications and on tapering and deprescribing.”

The risks of coming off psychotropic meds went largely unaddressed. People who have tried to do so without proper medical supervision have reported “brain fog,” as well as “emotional blunting, loss of motivation, suicidal ideation, and difficulty in withdrawing.” Some have also reported “shocklike sensations, flu-like symptoms, insomnia, nausea, and restlessness.”

It’s true that many medications, including some psychiatric medications, have been overprescribed. But they’ve been judged safe enough to be prescribed by primary care physicians as well as psychiatrists. Targeting and demonizing SSRIs and ADHD medications will leave patients with few ways to get the treatment they need. NPR reports that Dr. Theresa Miskimen Rivera, president of the American Psychiatric Association, has said, “It really is an oversimplification. And it really ignores the larger reality, which is that too many patients really cannot access timely, comprehensive care that is much needed for our nation.”

Personally, I have been taking various combinations of these medications, including SSRIs, for decades. My psychiatrists have never recommended stopping them, and I have never wanted to. The medications and the dosages have changed over the years, as needed. Psychotropic medications have literally saved my life as well as my sanity, and allowed me to function well in my relationships, my career, and my other activities. I don’t consider them cure-alls; I still have occasional symptoms of depression and hypomania. But being told by a government agency to quit them, or even to taper off them, scares me. I hope Kennedy’s ideas are never instituted, but given all the other recommendations he has proposed, I’m far from sure that they won’t be.

When Journaling Doesn’t Work

If there’s one thing people tell you to do when you have a mental health issue, it’s to start a journal. They may not call it that. They may say it’s a place to write affirmations, or things you’re grateful for, or aspirations. But what they really mean is a journal, a written record of what’s going on inside you.

But sometimes that doesn’t work. You may not be in touch with your inner feelings yet enough to know what your dreams mean or whether you need to explore your inner child’s trauma. It may simply be too soon.

Writing isn’t a bad idea, though. It just may be a mistake to call it a journal or to try to make it a way to explore your inner life. But there are other things you can do while you’re waiting until journaling is right for you.

One avenue you can try is other forms of writing. Don’t even think about your difficulties and how to solve them. You can get to that later, probably with the help of a therapist. For now, just write poetry. About anything. Your cat. The tree outside your window. The guy you just met at a party. Literally anything. Don’t try to be deep. Don’t try to write something meaningful, something for the ages.

Just put words on paper. Lord knows, they don’t have to rhyme. And don’t show it to anyone. The idea isn’t to impress anyone with your innate poetic talent. It’s just to get used to the idea of putting words on paper. Sure, it will feel weird at first (especially if you do try to make it rhyme). You don’t have to set any kind of goal like writing a poem every day or even every week. Just every once in a while, sit down at your computer (or, if you must, sit with a legal pad under a lilac bush) and write a poem. Or revise one you wrote the week before.

If you feel so inclined, try setting your poem to music. Strum that old guitar you haven’t dug out in months, or noodle around on GarageBand. Don’t make it a chore. Try it, just for the heck of it. Or you can decide to scrap the poems and just play around with music. There’s nothing that says you have to write poetry. What you’re doing doesn’t have to involve words at all.

Or, if none of that appeals to you, pick up a pencil and doodle, the way you do when you’re on infinity hold on the phone. Start with boxes and squiggles. If one of them starts to look like a pirate chest, go for it. See if your doodle turns into that, or something else. Draw a cartoon face. Then draw a setting for it. Is this your pirate? Is it a bartender? Is it an astronaut? Or take an empty candy wrapper and tape it to a sheet of paper. What can you make of it? Is it the body of a bird? Does it remind you of a ballet dancer’s costume? Does it begin to look like the tree outside your window? Just keep doodling.

The point of all this is not to create Great Art or to spur Great Revelations about your inner life. The point is simply to let yourself play—with words, with sounds, with sketches. Or pottery. Or katas. Just get used to the idea of letting something inside you come out. It doesn’t have to be important and meaningful. If it’s meant to be, that will come later.

I tried to start a journal once. It was pathetic. I recorded my daily activities, which at the time consisted largely of deciding whether to get out of bed that day. I recorded what I felt (depressed). Each page, each day, was the same. It was boring and no help at all. I was a dud at journaling.

Instead, I started this blog. In it, I was free to write about myself, but also about what I saw and heard in the world around me—what other people thought about mental illness and whether I agreed with them. Things I’d heard in the news and how the stories made me feel—outraged or comforted or confused.

It wasn’t journaling. I learned a lot from it, though (primarily that journaling wasn’t for me). No affirmations. No dream analysis. Over the years, though, it’s given structure to my week and a place to say things that aren’t necessarily profound. To ask questions and grope for answers.

Go thou and do likewise. Or go thou and do something else. The medium doesn’t matter.

Global Wins for Mental Health

Most of us know quite a bit about the U.S. mental health system, if it can be called that. We know about its successes and its failures, its help and its harm, and its practitioners and patients. But what about other countries? What large and small actions do they take to help people with psychiatric symptoms or disorders in their countries?

First, we know that approximately 78 countries around the world have socialized medicine or some form of universal health care that includes psychiatric services. Some have reported long wait times to get help, but others are easier to access. Most psychiatric drugs are subsidized. And the societies function in ways that foster mental health. Let’s look at a couple of programs that seem to be working.

Denmark

Denmark has a program designed to fight the stigma that accompanies mental disorders. It’s called One of Us.

Giuseppe Parlatore, who lives with paranoid schizophrenia, felt the stigma himself when a former teacher assumed—and said to him—that he must be either self-harming or violent and dangerous to others. He felt shame.

Parlatore, who was diagnosed in 2009, has worked hard to cope with his symptoms and carve out a life for himself. Now he is a leading mental health advocate, working with officials to lessen the stigma of mental disorders.

One of Us works with people called ambassadors, who have mental illnesses, to work with schools, police, and hospitals, sharing their stories and focusing on recovery. The emphasis on hospitals and police, they feel, is necessitated by the fact that personnel mainly see mental patients when they are in crisis rather than when they are coping better with their illnesses.

The Danish Health Authority also has a department of prevention and inequity. Anti-stigma campaigns are a part of the Ministry of Health. They hope to see lasting effects among the population, rather than just short-term upticks in awareness. The Danes see social contacts as more likely to change opinions than education alone.

Still, the battle against stigma requires persistence. Parlatore says that for him, it’s a “generational project.”

Japan

In Japan, there is a thing called kodokushi or “the lonely death.” The population of Japan is aging, and many older adults have little to no social contact. They can die alone and not be discovered for a long time. Social isolation leads to stress and loneliness. But a program designed to encourage physical health is having an effect on the elderly people’s mental health as well.

The “yogurt ladies” started as a way to promote health by selling yogurt to households. They were easily identifiable by their blue uniforms and bicycles. They succeeded very well in making people aware of gut health.

But gut health is also related to stress and chronic loneliness, two factors affecting mental health. Social isolation is, in turn, involved with gut microbiome diversity.

Loneliness is taken seriously in Japan. The government even includes a Ministry of Loneliness, as well as a task force on social isolation. The yogurt ladies provide weekly check-ins, a friendly face, and a chance to interact with someone. They see themselves as people who look out for others. Their services are a practical factor in maintaining gut health, but they perform an important function in reducing social isolation and preventing the “lonely deaths.” The lift they provide weekly is an important factor in maintaining mental health for the aging population of Japan.

Why don’t we have programs like this in the U.S.? I think you know the answer.

Update: The Keto Diet

Almost exactly a year ago, I wrote a post called “Is a Keto Diet Good for Bipolar?” In it, I examined the keto diet, one that involves consuming a very low amount of carbohydrates and replacing them with fat to help your body burn fat for energy. That means you should avoid sugary foods, grains and starches, most fruit, beans and legumes, root vegetables and tubers, low-fat or diet products, unhealthy fats, alcohol, and sugar-free diet foods.

What’s left? Good fats like avocados and EVOO, as well as meat, fatty fish, eggs, butter and cream, cheese, nuts, seeds, low-carb veggies, and herbs and spices.

So, what does that sound like—a diet high in meat and fats that avoids most fruit, beans, legumes, and ultra-processed foods? That’s right: the new upside-down food pyramid instituted by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., the U.S. Health Secretary.

In that previous post, I talked about studies that examined the keto diet as applied to depression and bipolar disorder in particular. The bottom line I left to WebMD: “The advice from WebMD is that there is ‘insufficient evidence’ to recommend the diet as beneficial for mood disorders. They don’t recommend it as a treatment option. As with any diet plan, consulting your doctor first is a good idea.”

Now, however, RFK, Jr., is touting the benefits of a ketogenic diet as a “cure” for schizophrenia. The New York Times called it “an unfounded claim that experts say vastly overstates preliminary research into whether the high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet might help patients with the disorder.”

In fact, the Secretary said, “We now know that the things that you eat are driving mental illness in this country.” He claimed that an unnamed doctor at Harvard had cured schizophrenia, and talked of studies “where people lose their bipolar diagnosis by changing their diet.” He was apparently referring to a 2019 experiment in which two patients “experienced complete remission of symptoms” with the keto diet. He said both patients “were able to stop antipsychotic medications and have remained in remission for years now.” Dr. Palmer, who originally reported the results, made no comment for the Times story.

The post promoting the claims was taken down from the website when evidence was requested to support the assertions.

The ketogenic diet is popular but difficult to stick to with its emphasis on fats over carbs. It’s up to you whether you try it to treat a mental disorder, but my honest opinion is that you shouldn’t stop taking your meds or doing your therapy. Try the keto diet in addition to them if you want to. Stopping your meds with the help of a physician who can guide you in tapering off safely is essential. Don’t go cold turkey, even if you do think the keto diet might help you. It’s simply not safe.

Unlike RFK, Jr., I’m not giving medical advice, only my opinion. Your mileage may vary. Your primary care physician or psychiatrist knows you and your condition best. Ask their advice and follow it.

Changes in the DSM?

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) has gone through changes, and its creators are discussing further changes that need to be made. The DSM-V was updated in 2022 to produce the DSM-V-TR (Text Revision). The new set of changes may result in a DSM-VI. (That’s not an official name, but people are already referring to it that way.)

Over the years, the changes to the DSM have sometimes been made to address a better understanding of what constitutes a mental disorder. For example, homosexuality was listed in the original DSM (1952) as a “Sociopathic Personality Disturbance,” considered a “sexual deviation.” The definition was gradually chipped away according to societal pressure from advocates and a dawning realization that homosexuality was not a mental disorder. It wasn’t until 1987 that the diagnosis or versions of it were completely eliminated.

Autism took a similar path. In the 1952 edition of the manual, autism was categorized under “schizophrenic reaction (childhood type).” It was not recognized as a separate developmental diagnosis on a spectrum until the DSM-III in 1980. Schizophrenia has nothing to do with it, and the newer text reflects that understanding.

Rather than the be-all and end-all of psychiatric knowledge and diagnosis, the DSM-V is better understood as a guidebook that helps practitioners drill down through a puzzling array of symptoms to reach at least a preliminary diagnosis. While the publication date for the newest revision of the DSM is still up in the air, the fact that it needs updating is clear.

So, what changes are in store in the next edition? Well, for one, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) is changing the name of the manual to “Diagnostic Science (or Scientific) Manual of Mental Disorders.” That’s hardly a significant change, given that psychiatry is less of a science and more of a practice (or art). The committees of experts who are doing the revisions will be augmented by people who have lived experience of the various disorders and people who are critics of the current DSM—of which there are many. Among the criticisms is the fact that the manual pathologizes everyday events into psychological disorders. Children’s temper tantrums become Oppositional Defiant Disorder, for example. This medicalization of everyday behaviors may result in overdiagnosis, not to mention overmedication. And it’s particularly true that an ER doctor confronted with someone who has a mental disorder cannot, in the 15 minutes they’re able to spend with the person, tell whether their hallucinations are due to schizophrenia, bipolar 1, drugs, or some other cause.

The new DSM will reportedly change the way it defines diagnoses, from a reliance on symptoms and characteristics to include consideration of environmental, socioeconomic, cultural, developmental, and biological factors. For example, whether a person has experienced physical or sexual abuse in childhood will contribute to trauma diagnoses. It’s hoped that considering the whole person, not just their symptoms, will lead to a better understanding of psychiatric and psychological conditions.

Clarification of diagnoses to include new features or diagnostic criteria, however, can lead to oversimplification, something that will need to be considered in preparing the new edition. Biological features of disorders are supposed to be included, despite the fact that there are no objective tests, such as genetic tests or fMRI, to pinpoint a psychiatric diagnosis. This, of course, may necessitate further revision of the DSM as such testing improves. It’s hard to imagine how a discussion of future advances in diagnosis will help current practitioners until those advances are made. It’s an acknowledgment that even further revisions will ultimately be required.

The insurance industry will also be very interested in the new edition, whenever it comes out. In addition to definitions of the different conditions and lists of symptoms that can be used to make a diagnosis, the DSM also provides billing codes for the various disorders. And, as we know, getting insurance reimbursement for a particular diagnosis is difficult at best unless it has a billing code attached to it.

What the average patient will think about the updated DSM, if they know about it at all, remains to be seen. At any rate, it’s encouraging to think that the psychiatrists’ “Bible” may lead to more accurate diagnoses and better treatments. I just can’t shake the feeling that as soon as it is published, it will already be obsolete, needing ongoing tweaks that won’t be included until such time as another substantial revision is considered necessary. How long will we live with DSM-V (TR), essentially an unfinished work? I suppose at some point, the APA must decide when the DSM-VI, a work-in-progress, is “good enough” to publish.

A Quick Turnaround—What’s Next?

On Wednesday, it was gone. On Thursday, it was back. Who knows what will happen tomorrow?

Many of us were stunned (if not exactly surprised) when it was announced that federal funding for mental health and addiction services was going to be cut dramatically. After all, other public health agencies have seen their budgets slashed and their grants revoked. It seemed to be only a matter of time until mental health resources were hit. And so it was.

Late this past Tuesday (as in 10:30 p.m.), the Trump administration said it would be cutting approximately $2 billion from programs that deal with mental health services and addiction prevention, treatment, and recovery services. The news went out from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the federal agency that oversees these programs, late in the day. The faxed letter about the cuts got to the press from agency employees who remained anonymous.

The New York Times reported that the cuts “would be effective immediately,” explaining only that the services no longer aligned with the agency’s priorities. The letter described those priorities as being to support “innovative programs and interventions that address the rising rates of mental illness and substance abuse conditions, overdose, and suicide.” Among the programs affected would be drug courts, screening and referral services, and other important initiatives serving youth and pregnant and postpartum women. It was a little confusing, as the SAMHSA agency was designed to do that.

NAMI had an immediate response. CEO Daniel H. Gillison said, “These abrupt and unjustified cuts will immediately disrupt suicide prevention efforts, family and peer recovery support, overdose prevention and treatment, and mental health awareness and education programming, along with so many more essential services, putting an unknown number of lives at stake.” He added, “These aren’t just numbers on paper. These are decisions that have real and harmful consequences for millions of people and communities around the country.” A dozen or more NAMI programs instantly lost funding. Among the programs affected would be “numerous education programs, including one that offers mental health training to school staff in grades kindergarten through 12.”

These funding cuts were apparently made without consulting Congress, who are working on an appropriations package, scheduled for the end of the month, that also addresses mental health and addiction services. Members of Congress lobbied strongly against the cuts.

Then, less than 24 hours later, the cuts were canceled, and funding was restored. No explanation was given; the cuts were simply made to disappear. They had been particularly unsettling after President Trump reauthorized the SUPPORT Act in December. It had funded programs for addiction and mental health, including some of the programs that were cut this week.

At the end of January, Congress is supposed to consider a major funding package that includes money for SAMHSA. What it will include appears still to be up in the air.

I guess we’ll see. And be ready to protest, just in case.

Channeling Positive Thoughts

Everyone who reads this blog (and some who don’t) knows what I think of the positivity movement. To put it in words of one syllable, I hate it.

I hate the memes and signs that say “Good vibes only,” or “If you want to feel better, smile,” or “The only disability is a bad attitude.” Or, worst of all, “You don’t need meds, you need to change your thinking.”

This attitude bugs me because it’s too close to the “Think and Grow Rich” gospel, which I can’t stand either. There are people who go around making money by pushing this attitude (or “attitude of gratitude,” as some phrase it).

To me, it dismisses the real emotional pain that many of us feel and the difficulty of making progress toward a happier, more fulfilling life. If it were as easy as just smiling, we wouldn’t have a crisis of mental illness and a lack of appropriate treatments. In real life, however, wishing mental illness away won’t help. You have to work hard at it, take your meds, go to therapy, do the work, and keep trying even when it feels impossible.

Recently, however, I at least partially changed my opinion on positivity. I had my left knee replaced and was faced with a series of complications, from repeated falls to lymphedema (This involves retaining fluids, in my case in my legs, and lots of swelling. It can lead to heart failure, which is why the docs were so concerned.) I had two stays in the hospital, followed in each case by a stay in a post-acute rehab. (Well, okay, a nursing home, but I was on the short-term wing.) All told, my hospital stays and post-acute stays ate up two months. One of my episodes between rehab and back to the hospital lasted only three days.

When I was in the rehab unit, I had Occupational Therapy and Physical Therapy. I don’t really remember much about the first stay, except that I was still affected by the Lasix I had been given in the hospital, so toileting and transfer from the walker to the toilet were things I had to relearn. When I first began, I needed to have a “spotter” in my room and a red cord to pull if anything went wrong. Later, I was deemed skilled enough to manage by myself. All I can say about that is that I was glad I had recently bought a 10-pack of underwear.

The second stay in rehab was more intense. I had to learn some very basic things all over again. How to walk with a walker and a cane without limping. How to sit down into a chair slowly rather than flopping or flinging myself down on it.

OT consisted of relearning to do everyday tasks like showering using a shower chair or bench (every few days, which is a lot more than I had been capable of before rehab). I had to learn to stand on both feet while I did a task like working a jigsaw puzzle to strengthen my balance and put away groceries in the little kitchen they had set up. And I had to learn how to put on compression stockings without help. (This was made easier when my OT person sent me a link to a pair of zippered compression socks I could order. Zippy socks. Of course, I had grippy socks too.)

PT included remembering to sit without my legs in a descending position (they found the one reclining chair in the facility for me to use) and to sleep with the foot of my bed raised. And there were the exercises. I learned to do foot pumps, quad sets, snow angels, glute squeezes, marching, leg lifts, and others using resistance bands. I increased the number of reps and sets for each. I walked for longer and longer distances with a cane. I did first ten, then 15, then 20 minutes on a cycling machine (my favorite). And they asked me what goals I had, and I told them that I needed to walk up 18 steps to get into the house and up to the bedroom on the second floor, and I wanted to be able to walk from the front door, up the gravel driveway to the car. There was a set of four stairs that I climbed up and down with my cane, and they advised me on how to walk on gravel with my walker.

So where does positivity come into all this? The staff appreciated my willingness to try and to try a little more the next day. Whenever I accomplished anything, they said, “Good job!” They told me that when they told some patients that it was time to do PT, they simply turned over or looked away. But I saw patients with more severe conditions than mine trying and trying again.

I made it my goal to increase my workouts daily, to do quad sets and leg lifts even when sitting in the recliner or lying in bed. I learned to decrease both my sodium intake and my fluid intake. And when I walked in my walker down the hall to the PT gym, I was by God positive. I had the determination to do more than the day before, or at least as much. I thanked the therapists for their help. I kept trying, even when it was hard.

So, in that way, it was like being positive about getting better with my mental illness. In that aspect of my life, too, I did the work. I learned new coping techniques. I kept up with what my therapists taught me. I believed in the power of my meds to help stabilize me, no matter how long it took or what anyone said.

It was a grueling education, but I think I came away with a greater respect for the power of positivity — when it’s combined with hard work. Just smiling won’t do it. Smiling and working to improve your situation can.

Politics, Mood, and Self-Care

It’s difficult for me to maintain a positive mental attitude when I’m troubled by bipolar disorder, especially the depression part. It’s even more difficult in today’s political landscape.

I don’t care what your political persuasion is or who you voted for. I don’t care if you’re for or against DEI or ICE. What I care about these days is what’s happening to mental healthcare in our country. But let’s leave government policies and programs for another day. Right now, I want to discuss politics and mood disorders.

We seem to be overwhelmed by politics, but also by our reactions to politics. Friendships have broken. Families have been torn apart. Lots of people suffer from cognitive dissonance when their brains try to balance their love for friends and family and distress at their views.

None of us knows what to expect next. The difficulty isn’t limited to one side or the other. People who want smaller government are learning that the cuts will include public services such as extreme weather forecasting and disaster recovery. Others with differing views are afraid to travel abroad because they fear that, even with passports, they may be detained when they try to return.

The situation is especially hard on people with mood disorders. People who have phobias or anxiety disorders can find their feelings increasingly out of control. Those who suffer from depression have exaggerated fears. Most debilitating of all is the not-knowing. Am I overreacting? Are these fears reasonable or exaggerated? Will the things I fear never happen? Should I watch the news? Should I avoid watching the news?

I’m suffering from news-dependent symptoms myself. I hesitate to discuss politics with friends unless I already know their opinions are similar to mine. And with new acquaintances on Facebook, I share memes and chat about books.

But when it comes to not getting overwhelmed, I have a few suggestions. Most of them you may already know—they’re versions of basic self-care.

Remove yourself from the trigger. Get out of the room or the house when the talk turns to politics. Offer to go on a beer run. Leave the room and make yourself a cup of tea. Tell your friends or relatives you need to get some air. The outdoors is largely a politics-free zone, aside from bumper stickers and billboards. If you walk with a friend, stay on non-threatening topics like your pets. And prepare a neutral topic to suggest: Do you think the Dodgers have a chance this year? What do you think of Beyoncé’s country album? Should I go on a Disney cruise this year or a trek to the Grand Canyon?

Self-soothing. Music is another way to distract yourself from the present chaos when you take that walk or any other time. Personally, I prefer music with lyrics, as instrumental music gives me too much time and space to contemplate difficult topics. If you wear earbuds (even without music), people are less likely to engage you in conversation.

Use distractions. If you read, stay away from news magazines, the internet, and newspapers. Instead, you may want to revisit books from your childhood. There’s nothing wrong with reading children’s books. They may take you back to a more pleasant time, or you may discover aspects of a book that you never noticed when you were young. Or try a new genre, such as a romance or mystery that isn’t likely to contain much politics. Old classics like Dickens or Austen are good choices, too.

Limit your exposure. Allow yourself 20 minutes for listening to or reading the news. You can do this more than once a day, but leave a couple of hours in between. Clean the bathroom or watch a reality show. Organize your closet. Plant flowers or herbs.

Do things that lift you up. Pray. Sing. Bake bread. Work on a journal or a painting. Do life-affirming activities that will improve your outlook and your spirit.

Oh, yeah. And remember to take your meds, especially if you have an anti-anxiety pill. You’ll need them.

Advice from the NYT

On December 30, 2024, the New York Times offered an article: “10 Ways to Keep Your Mind Healthy” in 2025, by Christina Caron and Dana G. Smith. Now, I’m not saying that their advice was bad. I’m just saying it didn’t go far enough. All of their recommendations are things we already know. Someone with a simple need for better mental health may get something from the article. But for someone with a mental disorder, it’s inadequate. Here’s what they said.

1. Move your body.

“If you’ve heard it once, you’ve heard it 1,000 times: Physical activity is one of the best things you can do for your brain.” Well, we have heard it 1,000 times. The Times notes that people feel better after a workout, but that ones who have a consistent exercise routine, there’s less risk of depression (and dementia). They attribute this to better blood flow and connections in the brain. This is hardly revolutionary advice.

2. Address your anxiety.

Easier said than done. NYT says: “Many Americans are anxious.” They suggest the following solutions. Face what makes you anxious to break the pattern of fear. They say that you can do this kind of exposure therapy with or without a therapist.

They also recommend that you focus on your values rather than anxiety. I’m not sure how this is supposed to work. One suggestion they give is to volunteer in your community. Then they advise that you not catastrophize—but they don’t tell you how to do that, except for journaling about whether you had an appropriate amount of worry compared to the situation.

3. Challenge your brain.

The authors note that this is “still up for debate,” but they say that crossword puzzles, reading, and brain games “can’t hurt,” especially regarding dementia. The most definite thing they way is that such pursuits “can’t hurt.” A professor of psychology adds that “chances are that’s probably good for your brain.” But “good for your brain” is a long way from mentally healthy.

4. Get a good night’s sleep.

Lack of sleep “can affect how they experience stress and negative emotions. They might also be more likely to ruminate, be quicker to anger, have more negative thoughts or find it harder to cope with stress.” Those are serious symptoms, and for once, the NYT recommends actual therapy—Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, or C.B.T.-I. They note that it is more effective than medication. At last, some useful information!

5. Get unstuck.

Good idea, but how to do it? According to the NYT, you should conduct a “friction audit.” which basically means identifying your problems and trimming them away, whatever that means. They also recommend “futurecasting,” or imagining you aren’t stuck and what steps would get you there. “Try to do at least one step each day.” Baby steps are good, of course, but doing one per day isn’t practical for most people with mental disorders. A therapist might help with this, but the NYT is silent regarding that possibility.

6. Stay cool.

At last, something that you may not already know! “Studies show that hot days impair our cognition and make us more aggressive, irritable and impulsive.” Typical ways of cooling off are recommended: stay cool and hydrated, use air conditioning or a fan, spritz yourself with cold water or take a cool shower, or go to a nearby cooling shelter. Nothing there but obvious remedies.

7. Quiet your inner critic.

If only we could! The inner critic is a real thing, and it makes you miserable. But the trick is how to do it. The authors suggest “letting go of that nagging feeling…and giving yourself credit credit for what you accomplish.” They do quote a psychology professor who suggests using “you” or your name rather than “I” when you engage in internal dialogue, which I take to mean affirmations.

8. Take care of your physical health.

This sounds good; the body and brain, of course, are interrelated. The NYT recommends taking a quiz about your physical health that analyzes common health conditions and behaviors such as blood pressure, cholesterol, and exercise. It’s said to estimate your risk for depression, as well as dementia and stroke. But most general practitioners these days use a specific depression screening quiz with more questions particular to that condition.

9. Make a new friend.

This is a great idea. People with mental disorders need a support system which can certainly include friends as well as family. One problem is gaining the courage and social skills to make overtures. The Times notes that loneliness can increase brain inflammation that damages brain cells and the connections between them. Then the article recommends reaching out to a friend or family member, joining a club, or attending a support group. Reaching out is difficult for people with depression in particular. Waiting for someone to reach in to you is sometimes all you can manage.

10. Forgive — or don’t!

Contradictory advice? Certainly. The Times article suggests that “forgiveness is an emotional process rather than an endpoint.” So, should you or shouldn’t you? Maybe. Forgiving someone who’s hurt you may lead to fewer negative feelings, the Times says, but they also recommend a book called You Don’t Need to Forgive: Trauma Recovery on Your Own Terms by Amanda Gregory.

I know what you’re going to say: This article is intended for the general public. It makes no mention of the many things such as therapy and medication that can help you achieve a healthy mind if you have a mental disorder. That the actions mentioned are meaningful adjuncts to those interventions.

But the title is misleading. I first got treatment for my mental health when I saw a sign for a mental health clinic and realized that whatever I was feeling, it wasn’t mentally healthy. At that point I received therapy, and later was prescribed medication. And they truly helped.

I would hate to think that someone like me would ready this article and think that the suggested actions, by themselves, will make a person mentally healthy. They are great adjuncts to proper treatment but won’t solve many problems that people with mental disorders have. If, like me, your only realization is that you don’t feel mentally healthy, the article may prevent or delay getting significant treatment.

So, go ahead. Try all the advice in this article. But if you still don’t feel you’re on an even keel, seek other kinds of help.