Bipolar 2 From Inside and Out

Author Archive

Control/No Control

When I was a kid, my family used to go to visit relatives in Campton and Beattyville, Kentucky. It was always a good time. There were barns to play in and fishing, berrying, eggs to gather, and so forth. To get there, we took what was then a toll road called the Mountain Parkway. I loved dropping change in the bucket as we passed through the toll stations.

The road wound and twisted up into the mountains. There were steep dropoffs along the sides. I don’t remember railings, though I suppose there were some. We visited there about once a year during summer vacation. My Dad drove.

I have a number of things on my List of Things I’ll Never Be Able to Do Again, and going to Campton is one of them. For one thing, I have no relatives left there anymore—most were quite aged back then and their children have scattered. But the more important reason is that I could not handle the drive.

When I was in Ireland with my husband, we rented a car and drove around the country. The GPS that came with the car was sketchy at best. It took us on one-lane roads that meandered through the hills. On the larger roads, there were many rotaries, which we hadn’t driven before. Eventually, we started relying on my phone and Google Maps, which didn’t get us lost as often or run us off into ditches. We still ended up going on twisty back roads.

But I was terrified the entire time we were driving. Dan had to drive since I couldn’t adjust to driving on the left (I tried once and gave up). My nerves couldn’t handle it. The entire time we were driving, I had my hand braced against the roof of the car. When it was particularly frightening, I made a peculiar humming noise that Dan had to learn to ignore. He’d remind me that I had anti-anxiety meds I could take, too. I did, but they didn’t stop my symptoms.

Fast forward a couple of years. We were in Gatlinburg, Tennessee, driving around looking for where we stayed and where we were going. Again, we used Google Maps on my phone. Again, we were traveling on twisty back roads with sudden hills and no shoulders to speak of. Again I clung to the Oh Shit handle and made the weird humming noise as we navigated the convoluted routes. Again I took anti-anxiety meds.

Then I had a revelation: I could never go to Campton again, even if Dan was driving. The bends in the road and the steep drop-offs would prove too daunting. I don’t want to put myself through that again if I don’t have to. And I don’t want to have to.

I don’t have trouble driving on surface streets or highways, even alone. Those I can handle—even for four- or five-hour drives.

When I’m driving, I feel in control of the vehicle and don’t have the massive anxiety. That is, unless the circumstances involve something that makes me feel out of control, like left-side driving or narrow roads with switchbacks and doglegs. Even if Dan drives and I navigate, I still do the clutching and humming thing. It’s exhausting. If I were driving, I would have to go 20 mph and mightily piss off the cars behind me.

The bottom line? I can drive myself places, but only under certain conditions when I feel in control. If there’s a factor—or more than one—that makes me feel out of control, I can’t do it.

I like to think that I’m not a control freak under other circumstances. There’s just something about a machine that weighs that much going at a speed that feels unsafe in terrain that strikes me as difficult. This still leaves me a lot of places I can go, even without Dan. But not everywhere. And that makes me feel sad and incompetent, two feelings that I don’t like and that there’s no medication for.

Category:

mental health

Tagged with:

Pill-Shaming

When I first started taking Prozac, when it was just becoming ubiquitous, my mother said, “I hear it’s a ticking time bomb!”

“Oh, dear!” I thought. “Mom’s been listening to Phil Donahue again.” (She had been, but that’s not the point.)

Back in the day, Prozac was hailed as a miracle drug and condemned as a killer drug. On the one hand, it was said to be a “magic bullet” for depression. On the other, it was supposed to result in addiction and suicide.

It’s probably true that it was prescribed too often to too many people who may not really have needed it. And it may have led to suicides—not because Prozac prompted such an action, but either because it was improperly prescribed or because it activated people who were already passively suicidal and pushed them into action.

At any rate, Prozac was not an unmixed blessing.

For me, it was closer to a miracle drug. It was the first medication that had any significant effect on my depression. I noticed no side effects.

But Prozac is no longer the psychiatric drug of choice. Since that time, hundreds—maybe thousands—of psychotropic drugs have been introduced and widely prescribed. Many have proved just as controversial as Prozac. Indeed, the whole concept of psychiatric drugs is now controversial.

I belong to a lot of Facebook groups that encourage discussion on psychological matters and have a lot of Facebook friends with opinions on them, sometimes very strong ones. Some of the people with the strongest opinions are those who condemn certain classes of psychiatric drugs or that category of drugs altogether. They share horror stories of addiction, atrocious side effects, zombie-like behavior, and even death from the use of these drugs.

Benzos are the drugs that are most often condemned. And it’s true that they can be addictive if they’re misused. Whether that’s because a doctor overprescribes them or a patient takes more than prescribed I couldn’t say. But I maintain that benzos aren’t inherently harmful when prescribed appropriately and supervised professionally.

I have personal experience with benzos. They were the first psychiatric drug I ever took, meant to relieve a rather severe nervous tic that affected my neck and head during junior high school. I do remember walking off a short stepstool while shelving books in the library, but I was not injured and the misstep could be attributable to ordinary clumsiness, which was something I was known for (and still am). The benzos were discontinued when I got better. I also took benzos in college because of pain due to temporomandibular joint problems.

Now I have benzos that my psychiatrist prescribed “as needed” for anxiety and sleep disturbances. After all the years I’ve seen him and my history of compliance with prescribed medication, plus the very low doses, he had no hesitation prescribing, and I have no objection to taking them.

But some of the people I see online object to any psychiatric drugs whatsoever. Again, the most common complaints are addiction, side effects, and zombie-like behavior. Of course, I can’t—won’t—deny that they have suffered these effects. Psychotropics are known to affect different people differently. I’ve had side effects from many of the ones I’ve taken that were too unpleasant for me to continue taking the drugs. But after all the different meds I’ve tried during my journey to a combination of drugs that work for me, it would be a surprise if I objected to them altogether.

But I don’t. I’ve had cautious, responsible psychiatrists who’ve prescribed cautiously and monitored rigorously, listening to me when I reported side effects.

So, my personal experiences have been good. I know not everyone’s experiences have been, for a variety of reasons.

What I object to is the drumbeat of “all psychotropic medications are bad and ruin lives.” And the memes that show pictures of forests and puppies that say “These are antidepressants” and pictures of pills with the caption “These are shit.”

I hope those messages don’t steer people who need them away from psychotropic medications. And I hope that people who do need them find prescribers who are conscientious, cautious, and responsible in prescribing them. On balance, I think they’re a good thing.

Category:

mental health

Tagged with:

I’m Sorry

The other day, my husband was putting together a magnifying lamp that I had bought to help me repair some jewelry. I was trying to adjust the lamp to a height where it would be usable and comfortable. The lamp was a cheap piece of shit and it broke.

Instantly, I apologized. The clamp broke. I apologized again. It turned out that the pin holding the clamp together broke. I apologized again. My husband determined that it was not fixable as it was. Guess what I did? That’s right — said, “I’m sorry.” I said I was sorry for ordering the cheap thing. I said I was sorry for wasting money. I was sorry for wasting my husband’s time. I was sorry for everything.

The week before, I wanted to go to an art house in a nearby town to see the documentary about Joan Baez. The whole way there, I was nervous — about the route we were taking, whether we would find parking near enough to the theater, whether we should eat dinner before or after the movie. And especially whether Dan would like the film. On the way home, I kept asking him, “Was that okay? Did you like it? Is it okay that I chose the movie? Is it okay that I chose that movie?”

On the way home, he reassured me. He liked the movie. He learned things he hadn’t known about Joan Baez. We were lucky to find the parking place so near the theater. It was a nice evening for a drive.

Then he said, “Where’s all this coming from?”

“I chose the movie and the time and bought the tickets and decided which theater to see it at. If anything went wrong, it was all my fault.”

“Ah. Old tapes.”

In these recent cases, things went right. Dan figured out a way to fix the magnifying lamp by cannibalizing another lamp. We got to the movie on time and got good seats. We found a handicapped parking spot open right across from the theater. The movie was great. I felt better after we got home.

Dan was right, though. The excessive apologies started in my past — not with Dan — further back in time than that. If something was my choice, and it didn’t turn out great, it was wrecked. I realize this is all-or-nothing thinking, which is counterproductive.

Even before the old tapes, though, I had a habit of feeling sorry for everything and saying so. I apologized for everything. And I punished myself. If I said something “wrong” or even a tiny bit off-color, I tapped my cheek with an open hand, symbolically slapping myself for doing something bad. (I think it’s important to note that my parents never slapped me as a child, so I don’t know where that came from.)

And I apologized endlessly. For everything. My friends noticed. They asked why I did it. They let me know that it was annoying. I tried consciously to stop. And after a while, after having friends who stuck with me, after practice, I did stop. For a while.

Then I got in a relationship with a gaslighter and again felt guilty for everything. He blamed me for things I did and things I didn’t do. Once, he even claimed that when I did something wrong in front of company, I had offended his honor. And of course, if I selected anything — where we went, what we ate, what music we listened to, I was at fault. I was at fault for liking mayo on my sandwiches and for not offering him a bite of my sandwich. I was seriously wrong not to wait for him even though he was past the time for a meet-up with friends. Wrong to hook up with a friend while he was hooking up with one of mine in the next room. Eventually, I shut down, afraid to do anything.

Years later, I got past the apologizing, for the most part. The past two weeks, I’ve been backsliding. I think it may be because money has been extra tight, which makes me extremely nervous, and I’ve had to tell Dan he can’t make some purchases now. That feels treacherous, even though he doesn’t complain or blame or shame me. But it puts me back into the mindset of blaming myself before someone else can. It’s not comfortable for either of us. It’s all I can do not to apologize for feeling this way, for my disorder having this effect.

I’m hoping that writing about it will help me work out how I feel. And maybe make the apologies back off. At least for a while.

Category:

mental health

Tagged with:

Am I Neurodivergent?

Last week I wrote about language that has been lost from technical meaning to become popular usage. This week I want to explore a term that may or may not apply to me—neurodivergent.

The dictionary definition I looked up said that neurodivergent means “differing in mental or neurological function from what is considered typical or normal.” It added that the term is “frequently used with reference to autistic spectrum disorders.” The alternate definition given is “not neurotypical,” which is no help at all.

I’m not on the autism spectrum, so I don’t “qualify” as neurodivergent that way. And I don’t have any of the other disorders, like ADHD, that typically are associated with neurodiversity. So where does that leave me?

Another definition: “Neurodiversity describes the idea that people experience and interact with the world around them in many different ways; there is no one ‘right’ way of thinking, learning, and behaving, and differences are not viewed as deficits.”

I like that better. It leaves room for a lot of varieties of neurodivergence.

A medical website explained it this way: “Neurodivergent is a nonmedical term that describes people whose brains develop or work differently for some reason. This means the person has different strengths and struggles from people whose brains develop or work more typically. While some people who are neurodivergent have medical conditions, it also happens to people where a medical condition or diagnosis hasn’t been identified.”

Wikipedia also notes, “Some neurodiversity advocates and researchers argue that the neurodiversity paradigm is the middle ground between strong medical model and strong social model.”

It’s true that my bipolar disorder means my brain and my behavior are not typical. I feel neurodivergent, even though I know that’s hardly a criterion. I’ve accepted that my bipolar is somewhere in the middle ground between the medical model and the social model. For a long time, I believed in the medical model absolutely. To me, my bipolar disorder was brought on by bad brain chemistry. I couldn’t see any glaring social problems such as abuse in my family. Mine was very much the traditional social model—working father, stay-at-home mother, one sister. I never suffered domestic violence or sexual abuse.

What I didn’t see was that there are other kinds of traumatic events, some of which I did experience as a child. Some of them were so painful that I remember having meltdowns because of them. Young adulthood brought more trauma. Since then, a combination of medication and therapy has helped. Perhaps the medication helped with the part of my disorder that was caused by my brain, while therapy helped the social trauma part.

Lately, I’ve been thinking about the idea of a spectrum. Although autism is often considered using the convenient concept of a spectrum, I know that “being on the autism spectrum” is not accepted by all. High-functioning or low-functioning, people are at base autistic or non-autistic, not “a little bit autistic,” as the spectrum seems to imply. Other people find the spectrum idea useful.

I’ve also thought about the introvert/extrovert spectrum. It makes sense to me that no one is truly at either end of that spectrum—all introvert or all extrovert. Nor is anyone pure ambivert, evenly poised between the two ends of the spectrum. We’re all various degrees of ambivert, leaning toward one side or the other, but sharing some of the characteristics of each.

My brain has developed differently or works differently for some reason. But according to the spectrum philosophy, no one is totally neurotypical or totally neurodivergent. We’re all jumbled somewhere in the middle. A little to one side and we’re considered one or the other. So, I see myself as on the neurodiversity spectrum—neither one nor the other and not evenly balanced between the two. Somewhere in the relative middle, to one side or the other. Part neurodivergent and part neurotypical.

Whatever I am, I’m not 100% neurotypical or 100% neurodivergent. But I’m at least partly neurodivergent. And I’m comfortable with that.

Category:

mental health

Tagged with:

Language Lost

There are many words that are specific to psychology, including diagnoses, symptoms, and therapeutic techniques. Many of those terms, however, have worked their way into general conversation. Some think this is a good thing as it makes society more aware of the language we as psychiatric patients use. Others object to this use of language. They see it as diluting the meaning of the terms.

Two of the most common words that have made this shift are bipolar and OCD. Instead of diagnoses, they’re often used as descriptions of people or things that are thought to share the characteristics of the disorders. “The weather is bipolar this month.” “Beth’s house is really tidy. She’s so OCD.” These usages are, of course, inaccurate. Weather can’t have a psychiatric disorder, and a neat house is not enough to diagnose a person with OCD.

The thing is, people aren’t using them literally. Weather being bipolar is a metaphor. It conveys the idea that the weather is changeable, seemingly randomly. Calling weather bipolar expresses the concept more vividly, which is probably why it has become so popular. Calling someone OCD is an exaggeration used for effect. They’re saying that Beth is not just neat, but excessively neat. The people who use these expressions don’t have any real idea of what the terms mean. They’ve just heard them used and have only a vague, superficial idea of what they mean.

Spoons is another metaphor gone astray. Originally, it was used to describe the depletion of energy that someone with an “invisible illness” feels when they’re required to do more than they’re capable of on any given day. Spoons are a variable commodity. The neurodivergent or physically challenged never know how many “spoons” they will have at the beginning of a day and when they’ll run out of them. It’s a very powerful metaphor which makes it easier to understand the concept.

Nowadays, however, it’s used by people who don’t face these challenges to mean simply “I’m tired” or “I’m done for the day.” But these people don’t have a widely varying amount of energy at the start of each day. Oh, they may be more or less tired depending on the quantity and quality of their sleep. But they don’t begin with so few spoons that getting out of bed requires an enormous expenditure of spoons that depletes them for the rest of the day.

The word triggers is not a metaphor, but a word that has weakened over time. In psychological terms, a trigger is something that brings back vivid memories and sensations of a traumatic incident. The person who is triggered cannot control their reactions and will experience the event as if it were actually occurring in real-time. In its new meaning, a trigger is anything that a person doesn’t like or causes them to be uncomfortable. This discomfort is minor and fleeting, and does not cause sensory overload. People who use “triggered” this way betray a deep misunderstanding of the term and often make fun of the concept altogether.

These and other terms like neurodivergent and spectrum are also frequently misunderstood or misused. Some are still being defined and arguments about what they really mean often occur.

People who use the words in their specific, technical sense sometimes speak of “reclaiming” them. They are offended by the perceived misuse of the various terms and want to restrict them to their original, technical meanings. They want other people to stop using them in their new senses. They feel the new usage cheapens the words.

The thing is, language doesn’t work that way. Once a word or phrase has “escaped into the wild” and is being used with a different shade of meaning, there’s no getting it back. No matter how much you try to educate people about the “real” meaning of the word, most people will not even realize they are using it “wrong” and won’t stop using it in the new sense. In fact, the first dictionary definition of bipolar is “having or relating to two poles or extremities,” not the disorder. The non-psychiatric sense of OCD as an adjective hasn’t made it to the dictionary yet, but it’s only a matter of time now.

Personally, I can think of things a lot more heinous than describing me and the weather the same way. Is it ignorant? Yes. Is it insulting? Probably. I just think it’s a waste of time correcting one person at a time or trying to educate the masses about it. Millions of people are still going to do it, and there are more important things to educate them about.

Category:

mental health

Tagged with:

Stigma, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Those of us with brain illnesses such as bipolar disorder, OCD, PTSD, and schizophrenia often speak of the stigma associated with our problems. It’s no wonder—stigma affects our lives in both predictable and unpredictable ways.

For instance, say you’ve become comfortable talking about your disorder. Then one day when you’re at a reunion or some other gathering, you happen to mention it and get the glazed-eyes-fixed-smile-back-away-slowly response. Sure, a lot of people don’t know what to say to you, but that reaction just makes it clear that you are different and, to that person, potentially a source of danger. Someone to be avoided. Someone not to engage with.

That’s stigma.

Prejudice is related to stigma. It’s just a short step away. Prejudice happens when people have a preconceived idea of what brain illness looks like. (That’s what prejudice means.) This could be a person who assumes that a serial killer or mass shooter is obviously “insane.” Their assumptions are reinforced when it’s revealed that the perpetrator had a history of psychological problems or had taken medication. They’re ignorant of the facts—that most killings are prompted by motivations such as rage, gender or racial hatred, jealousy, or fear. They don’t know that the mentally ill are much more likely to be the victims of violence than to be perpetrators.

People with prejudice against people with mental illness can also assume that psychiatric diagnoses are not “real.” They think people with these conditions can—and should—just “snap out of it,” “pull themselves up by their bootstraps,” or “get over” their problems. They look down on people who seek help. They make jokes about “crazies” and “lunatics.” They believe that anyone with a “real” mental illness is in a locked ward in an “insane asylum,” or should be. They don’t know that straightjackets aren’t used anymore and feel they’re funny Halloween costumes.

In other words, people who are prejudiced lack understanding and empathy.

Discrimination takes it one step further.

When people with brain illnesses suffer from discrimination, they lose opportunities because of their condition. If they are open about their diagnosis on applications, they may never receive a callback or an interview for a job. They may start receiving bad evaluations at work if they have to leave for doctor’s appointments or be let go for not getting along with other workers, many of whom may have prejudice against them. They don’t receive the accommodations required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Discrimination can also be involved with decisions from Social Security Disability. It’s not supposed to be that way, but people with mental illnesses are likely to have more difficulty “proving” that they have a disability severe enough to warrant supplemental income.

So what’s to be done? Education is the solution we always advocate. But it’s a hard ask. It’s difficult to get anyone to learn about the realities of brain illnesses. They don’t learn about it in school, and the messages they get from the media do little except reinforce the stigma surrounding the various conditions. In fact, they perpetuate much of the stigma.

Pushback is another strategy. We simply cannot let it pass when someone makes a prejudiced remark or demonstrates a lack of understanding. We can speak up about inappropriate Halloween costumes or assumptions about violence and the mentally ill. We can inform others that not all homeless persons are mentally ill. In fact, most homelessness is caused by a lack of affordable housing and low wages.

When it comes to discrimination, legislation and activism are often the solutions or at least the beginnings of them. Lobbying efforts regarding policy and treatment will help. Lots more needs to be done to inform legislators about the very basics, much less the possible ways to address the problems. Reporting violations of the ADA may not lead to resolutions, but it still needs to be done.

Of course, it’s difficult for many people with brain illnesses to do these things. We are frequently isolated and doubt our own abilities. Confronting legislators, educating them, and lobbying for their attention is daunting. Neurotypical people have trouble doing it, especially without an organization that gives them leverage. But it’s work that needs to be done. I admit that I’m not at the forefront, though these blog posts and my books are intended to help educate, and the groups I belong to try to do likewise.

It’s not enough. But it’s a start.

Category:

mental health

Tagged with:

Positivity and Acceptance

Those who follow this blog have seen me rail against toxic positivity. When it’s not absurd, it’s insulting to those of us with mood disorders. No, we can’t just cheer up. If we could look at the bright side, we wouldn’t have depression or anxiety. You may be able to choose happiness, but I can’t. I’ve needed medication and therapy just to feel meh at times. If I could turn bipolar disorder off like a light switch, don’t you think I’d do it?

Toxic positivity can be seen nearly everywhere, in a lot of different situations: the self-help movement, of course, but also business, medicine, and even religion – as well as endless memes. American society is rife with toxic positivity. It appears in motivational business conventions and TED Talks. Salespeople are advised to think positively and envision success. Breast cancer survivors are advised to keep a positive attitude, to the extent that they are encouraged to tell how the disease has had a positive effect on their lives and relationships. (Expressions of fear, anger, and other natural emotions in response to the diagnosis are downplayed or discouraged.) Religions can exhort us to count our blessings or “manifest” our wants and needs by using positive thoughts to attract them.

Positivity becomes toxic when it is seen as the only method of coping with problems in life, even ones that have other solutions or none. Toxic positivity presents relentless cheer as the only acceptable reaction and a panacea for every difficulty. And toxic positivity leads people to demand that others take up the mindset and apply it to every situation, even devastating ones. As such, it denies the reality of human suffering and normal emotional responses. It’s a form of non-acceptance.

So, what is the alternative? What is a more natural – but still effective – technique for dealing with difficulties? How can those of us who have mood disorders or any other brain illness find ways to navigate through life without slapping on a smile and coercing our emotions to fit a certain mold?

Radical acceptance is one answer. Radical acceptance means that you accept your inner feelings and your outward circumstances as they are, especially if they are not under your control. You acknowledge reality without trying to impose a set of emotional mandates on it. Your acceptance and acknowledgment may involve pain or discomfort, but those are understandable, normal human conditions. They are natural conditions that evoke a natural response.

Rooted in Buddhist teachings and given a name by Marsha Linehan, the psychologist who developed dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), radical acceptance uses mindfulness to help people learn to face and regulate their emotions. Interestingly, one 2018 study found that accepting your negative emotions without judgment is a factor in psychological health.

With radical acceptance, when you encounter difficult situations and emotions, you note their presence without trying to suppress them. You accept them, as the name implies. This attitude can address – and reduce – feelings of shame and distress that you may feel, especially when you are not able to simply shut off those feelings and replace them with positivity. That doesn’t mean that you wallow in unpleasant feelings or allow unfortunate circumstances to stunt your responses.

Instead, you note the feelings – accept that they exist – and “hold space” for them within you. You appreciate that your emotions can lead you to new understandings of and reactions to your circumstances. For example, instead of adhering to the unattainable maxim that “Failure is not an option,” you can recognize when you have indeed failed and accept it as a natural part of life. You can then move on to a mindset of growth where you use that failure to inform your future actions. You develop a more accurate picture of the world and can begin implementing real solutions.

Of course, there are situations where radical acceptance is not appropriate. Abusive situations, for one, shouldn’t simply be accepted without being addressed. But neither will positive thinking resolve them. They require action, from seeking help from a trusted individual to leaving the situation to contacting law enforcement or an organization that can help.

But in other circumstances, radical acceptance may be an answer for some. For myself, I’ll just be satisfied if radical acceptance helps drive out toxic positivity. I don’t think it will, but a person can dream.

Category:

mental health

Tagged with:

It’s Me This Time

I was talking to my mother, and I became very upset. I don’t remember now what we were talking about or what specifically I felt. It could have been disappointment because my parents could only afford a community college rather than a four-year university. It could have been sorrow caused by the breakup of a friendship. It could have been distress because someone made fun of me.

Whatever it was, I began crying. And as was common back then, once I started crying I couldn’t stop. My out-of-control emotions led to an out-of-control reaction.

And then my mother said, “Everyone goes through this at times.”

My instant thought was “But this time it’s me.”

I know I don’t have a monopoly on suffering. Looking back, the things that aroused an emotional storm in me were nothing much, things that could be remedied. I applied to four-year universities anyway and got a scholarship deal that allowed me to enjoy a first-rate education. I somehow managed to make new friends. I learned to cope with other people’s reactions to me, eventually.

Still, my emotions remained stormy. I would cry over anything or nothing. I would feel hurts intensely and break down frequently.

But I maintain that my reaction to my mother’s undoubted truth had some validity. When difficulties hit, knowing that others had experienced the same hurts and disappointments did not help me. I was experiencing these events through a lens of intense mood swings – bipolar disorder. And that’s not something that “everyone” goes through.

It’s true that I overdramatized just like any teen to a certain extent. But there was an added edge, a force driving my emotions past the normal. I couldn’t control what I was feeling or how extremely I expressed it. My disappointment was devastating. My sorrow was cataclysmic. My distress was hysterical. It’s no wonder my mother had no idea what I was feeling or how to deal with it. I didn’t know myself.

When people talk about bipolar, we usually talk about the back-and-forth, the rollercoaster. The intensity of the feelings gets less attention. It’s not just that we have mood swings. It’s that those moods are often out of control.

Seeing that from the outside, as my mother and my friends did, was no doubt beyond confusing. We may all go through these moods, but not everyone has the added emotional kick of bipolar pushing them past the normal into a realm that we ourselves don’t understand. If it was confusing for my loved ones, it was equally or more confusing for me.

I was like that for a long time. My experiences at college and after were colored by the fact that I didn’t know why I was the way I was. I went many years being beaten up by my own mind, my own emotions, my own brain. I despaired of ever finding a way out, and my despair was extreme, too.

Now, I’m diagnosed and medicated appropriately. I still have times when my emotions go a bit beyond the “norm.” I still have breakdowns occasionally. My startle reflex is exaggerated, and my anxiety still overwhelms me sometimes.

But at least now I understand what’s happening and why. Now, I seldom have to envy the “everyone” who experiences everyday life with less intense emotions. I may still have mood swings, but they no longer dominate my life. They’re more in line with what the general population would consider average.

I’ve finally achieved the stability that my mother knew deep down I didn’t have, even if she didn’t understand why not. I’m not knocking her; I didn’t understand it either. But I’m not that different anymore. And while I used to have a love-hate relationship with the concept of “normal,” I don’t hate it the way I did. Now, I’m more a part of “everyone.”

Category:

mental health

Time Out From Life

I was stuck during my first year in college. I was a linguistics major and couldn’t see my way clear to a career in the field. I thought about changing my major to random ones like landscape architecture and hotel management. I had no passion for either one, but I figured at least I could get a job.

I was also suffering from a major depressive swing. I missed classes, though I managed to pass them. I couldn’t sleep. I spent hours in the middle of the night sitting in the hallway, staring at an ornate coloring poster on the opposite wall, hypnotized by its intricate black outlines.

I decided to take a year off. I was incapacitated and couldn’t go on at that time. I figured I could reassess my choice of majors while I pulled my head together. I always had the intention of going back at the end of that time out.

I also needed money for that next year of college, so I got a job as a cashier and waitress on the second shift at a local Frisch’s restaurant. I was a good cashier and a lousy waitress, and I spent quite a bit of time in the bathroom, crying into the roller towel. I learned how to swear. My coworkers noticed that I was either worried and anxious or numb and sad. (One manager asked me, “What does a girl your age have to worry about except am I pregnant?” The other told me to smile more. Needless to say, this was not helpful.)

That time out from college was important to me psychologically. It didn’t solve my problems, and I was still undiagnosed and unmedicated. I began to realize that my problems went further than what my major was. And I made friends at work and learned a lot about self-reliance. I had time and space to think. My parents and my high school friends formed my support system.

I did go back to college the next year. I changed my major to English, which was more satisfying and more in line with my interests (though not really better on career possibilities). I continued through the next three years without taking more time off. As you may have guessed, the anxiety and depression didn’t leave. I had a fling with a musician – my first – and when it ended, I didn’t know how to handle it. Then I had a totally disastrous relationship, fraught with gaslighting. Again, I had trouble sleeping. I lost weight. I drank too much. The swings between hypomania and depression were noticeable.

When I graduated, I went back to working at the restaurant, then got a job at an advertising agency as an assistant to the treasurer. I moved into my own apartment and began a long-distance relationship with my eventual husband. I considered going back to school for an M.A., again in English, which I eventually did. I was still untethered, but I went into treatment for depression. (It wasn’t until many years later that I learned that my diagnosis was really bipolar.)

A depressive swing also caused me to take a time out from work later in life. This was the one that lasted two years and had me applying for disability. (I didn’t get it.) It was only psychologically important in that it graphically demonstrated how badly I needed help. At least the time I missed from college was something I chose to do rather than something that blindsided me.

The takeaway from all this, I think, is that the ups and downs of bipolar disorder mean that my life was destined not to go smoothly. While I am pretty high-functioning – I was able to earn college degrees and hold various jobs, at least for a while – there have been times when my illness has overwhelmed me and I need time out from my “normal life.” And those occasions come on me unpredictably, as is the way of bipolar mood swings. While I haven’t needed to, or been forced to, take a time out lately, I know it could still happen. That’s just the nature of the disorder. I hope my medication and therapy will make the possibility less likely, though.

If you’ve taken a time out too, I’d encourage you not to think of it as a permanent thing. It could be something that you needed to do, and something that may have relevant significance for you as you look back on it, as was true for me. Most of all, I hope you get help and support to get through it.

Category:

mental health

Tagged with:

What Is It With Showers Anyway?

Girl is choosing cosmetics in bathroomIt is fairly widely known that people with bipolar disorder and/or depression have trouble taking a daily shower. It’s not that we don’t know what’s involved in taking a shower, or why it would be good for us to do so, it’s simply that showering uses up a tremendous number of spoons.

Here’s what showering looks like according to Andrew Solomon, author of the now-classic The Noonday Demon:

I ran through the individual steps in my mind: You sit up, turn and put your feet on the floor, stand, walk to the bathroom, open the bathroom door, go to the edge of the tub…I divided it into fourteen steps as onerous as the Stations of the Cross.

I performed a similar exercise in one of my blog posts and here’s my version:

First I have to find a clean towel and a bar of soap, get undressed without seeing myself in the mirror, fiddle with the water temperature, wash and shampoo, dry off, find clean underwear, and that’s not even thinking about drying my hair and figuring out what I can wear! Oh, my God, I’ve used up all my spoons just thinking about it! I should just eat Cocoa Puffs and go back to bed.

Now let me say, first of all, that I don’t really like showers. I grew up taking baths and have never enjoyed the sensation of water spraying in my face. But with my bad back and bad knees, getting up from sitting in a bathtub is nearly impossible these days. (Please don’t ask me why anyone would want to sit in dirty water. Everyone says that when I say I prefer baths. I have a nice long soak, steeping in the clean water like a big teabag, and only then wash up and get right out. Used to, I mean.)

To most people, showering is a single act that requires the expenditure of a single spoon. Take a shower; that’s it. But for those of us with invisible illnesses, each separate step may require its own spoon. Take something as simple as finding a towel, for instance. Go to the linen closet, grab a towel and voilà! Only a fraction of a spoon, if that.

But surely you don’t think I have had the spoons to fold and put away my laundry. It is all there in a jumble on top of the dryer. (Who needs a wrinkle-free towel anyway?) I have to root around to find one, and maybe twice if a cat has thrown up on the first one I pick. (They love sitting on clean laundry.)

If I have to go to a business meeting I force myself to use some of those spoons showering and getting dressed and acting respectable. But I will pay for it later, collapsing after the meeting in need of a mega-nap.

Now here’s a little secret I’ll tell you. Most people believe you gain spoons by going out of the house – walking in the fresh air, meeting friends for lunch, shopping, going for a drive (does anyone do that anymore?). But the fact is that, according to Spoon Theory, you get a certain number of spoons every day when you wake up. You cannot gain, buy, beg, borrow, or steal any more spoons, not even by breathing fresh air. You can only spend them.

Given the mathematics of spoons, I don’t spend a single one that I don’t absolutely have to. Not going out? No shower. Have to go out for a loaf of bread or a drive-through meal? Wash up in the sink. If I need a shower between outings, my husband reminds me and facilitates by, for example, rummaging on the dryer for a clean towel and clean clothes or a clean nightshirt.

I need those spoons for doing my work at home in my smelly pajamas more than I do for the ordeal of showering.

Category:

mental health

Tagged with: